You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 45, Issue 1
  • Comment on ‘Exaggerating contraceptive efficacy: the implications of the Advertising Standards Authority action against Natural Cycles’

Article info

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Letter to the editor
Comment on ‘Exaggerating contraceptive efficacy: the implications of the Advertising Standards Authority action against Natural Cycles’

Authors

  1. Correspondence to Dr Raoul Scherwitzl, NaturalCycles Nordic AB, Stockholm S-111 37, Sweden; raoul.scherwitzl{at}naturalcycles.com
View Full Text

Citation

McIlwaine E, Rowland S, Berglund Scherwitzl E, et al
Comment on ‘Exaggerating contraceptive efficacy: the implications of the Advertising Standards Authority action against Natural Cycles’
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health 2019;45:78.

Publication history

  • First published January 8, 2019.
Online issue publication 
January 10, 2019

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.