You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Editorial
Time to re-evaluate rhesus testing and anti-D prophylaxis in abortion care

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2020-200815

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Footnotes

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests National Health Service (NHS) clinician representative of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) abortion care guideline (NG140) and co-author of the systematic review referenced in this editorial.

    • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

    • Provenance and peer review Commissioned, externally peer reviewed.